<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP vs Ruby on Rails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jilles.net/perma/2007/05/29/php-vs-ruby-on-rails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jilles.net/perma/2007/05/29/php-vs-ruby-on-rails/</link>
	<description>Insert witty tagline here</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pt</title>
		<link>http://www.jilles.net/perma/2007/05/29/php-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>pt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jilles.net/perma/2007/05/29/php-vs-ruby-on-rails/#comment-598</guid>
		<description>i love php and i hate this type of talk. its the swan's song.

big deal about 40%: cobol still efficiently runs 70% of the banking industry. by this measuring, cobol rocks!

seriously: ruby is a very powerful, elegant and compact lang. and all the devs community should be thankful to dhh and ror for lighting the path ahead for new apps.

php devs *must* embrace ror's standards or 3rd step will be "then you end"

reply if you can...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love php and i hate this type of talk. its the swan&#8217;s song.</p>
<p>big deal about 40%: cobol still efficiently runs 70% of the banking industry. by this measuring, cobol rocks!</p>
<p>seriously: ruby is a very powerful, elegant and compact lang. and all the devs community should be thankful to dhh and ror for lighting the path ahead for new apps.</p>
<p>php devs *must* embrace ror&#8217;s standards or 3rd step will be &#8220;then you end&#8221;</p>
<p>reply if you can&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
