Yesterday I found myself writing a branching strategy. We’ve been using a software configuration tool (CVS) since I’ve been working there. But the branching strategy was somewhat ad-hoc. Whatever we felt like, we did. Now our new project nears its first release onto production servers, I thought it was time to re-think our branching strategy. When thinking about how to branch, it seems to me it is choosing between overhead and stability. The more branches you use, the more work is independent from each other, providing stability to that branch. However, the more branches you create, the more work goes into merging those branches, documenting what’s on which branch, etc.
Having such a branch strategy helps at least in one way: everyone should learn this strategy by hart. Once that is done, nobody will be surprised as in: “Oh? I didn’t know we created a new branch for that functionality”.But coming up with good versioning tactics that “don’t get in the way” too much is pretty hard. Of course, there has been some scientific research done in that field. That resulted into some pretty documents that cover everything from A to Z. (I particularly like that document that treats all of the branching tactics like another GoF pattern.) Of course, there is a lot of difference between the strategies involved for an internal product, a shrink-wrapped product or a website.
Obviously, Marktplaats.nl is in the website department here. But even then, there are a lot of differences. It has already been in some newspapers that we are opening websites in foreign countries (foreign to The Netherlands that is). Aha, that opens up entirely another can of worms. Now we deploy our website for multiple countries. Each of these countries could run a different version of our product. That might been driven by the fact that in some countries (country A) a particular feature is hard needed, but in others maybe not (country B). But then, where do you do the bug fixing? Both country A and B need that same bug fix, but what has been deployed for those countries might reside on different branches! That brings in a lot more overhead if you ask me.
Even armed with a lot of scientific articles about this topic I’m still in doubt about what strategy to choose. So I’d like to invite everyone who’s in the same situation as me to contact me. What branching strategy do you use? What do you like about it? What policies do you have in place? And most of all, I’d like to get in touch with Joel Spolsky about this topic. He’s advocating the usage of a SCM-tool (just like me!), but every tool has is incorrect usages. Joel, how are you using CVS to maintain your product?Share